But the reasoning is not that simple as the solution. Probably the problem comes from fact that you can:

1. prove the statement – in that case “natural”, intuitive thought is an induction; or

2. point the strategy (constructive proof), but in such case “natural” thinking is greedy algorithm.

Both don’t work ðŸ™‚

Thank you Steve for you Puzzle page.

]]>one player knows they are going first

they can both see the amounts

they can ONLY choose from an end ]]>

– A could manipulate the order of the coins

-if the coins were ‘c1′,’c2′,’c3′,’c4’, they could choose between c1 and c4

am i right so far?

]]>